User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EggRoll97 | 39 | 7 | 4 | 85 | Open | 15:07, 19 April 2025 | 5 days, 19 hours | no | report |
| LaundryPizza03 | 58 | 68 | 22 | 46 | Open | 03:18, 17 April 2025 | 3 days, 7 hours | no | report |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 5.160.123.34 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Probably a FP. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:44, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2001:8003:b15f:8000:b894:8ff4:4216:2863 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 809 twice in the last 5 minutes (Possible SPI/Project space disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:31, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Unsure. It's not common for IPs to make comments at SPI reports. But this could be good faith. I am passing on this one. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- 1.140.67.237 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- No edits since being warned. Now at level III. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- 182.188.53.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 12:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- 100.38.122.232 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- No disruption since being warned. Now at level III. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- 94.20.98.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 79 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing reference grouping tags, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Rule of Rules 1.8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Repeated removal of maintenance tags, removal of cited content, adding uncited content and randomly removing words. Stooob (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- 91.242.155.157 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Chucky season 3: vandalism after final warning. IP is edit warring despite numerous reverts from multiple editors. CycloneYoris talk! 18:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- MyLittleDoggy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Russell M. Nelson: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Pretty obvious sockpuppet of LTA GeraldFord1980 - see (now redacted) edit to Russell M. Nelson and this edit, which match previous history. FyzixFighter (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Greasycaeol (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. FMSky (talk) 19:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:204:ED80:16F0:7D2B:D4B4:BA2E:3DE7 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On XHITZ-FM: The /64 has very similar contribution patterns to blocked User:Mateo4238 — incorrect edits on radio stations and highways. A lot of bad edits are going under the radar. A long-term rangeblock would be very useful. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 19:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Annh07 (talk) 12:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:69b0:4af0::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 15:48, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive editing; including the persistent pattern of including unsourced statements that aren’t substantiated upon request, instead the ‘need for citation’ template is removed. User in question has been warned multiple times for this specific behaviour on his talk page in regards to several other articles. GoldenDragonHorn (talk) 12:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Semi-protection would be pointless as both "combatants" are auto-confirmed. @MrHappy2020: These two entries at the article talk page do not look like the start of a discussion. Favonian (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Continued edits by an unregistered user that bloat the article with unsourced lists and information. Paleface Jack (talk) 14:58, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Recent problematic edits are all from the 2804:7f20:11a:ea01::/64 range. They have been often reverted, but very rarely warned, making it controversial to block them. I know it's difficult to "catch the attention" of ever-changing IPv6 addresses, but an attempt should at least be made. Favonian (talk) 15:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: For years this page has continuously been restored without reliable sources, and in violation of WP:NTOUR. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 17:33, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor hopping across IPs to repeatedly remove referenced content. — MarkH21talk 17:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:40, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello admins,
I would like to request **semi-protection** (or full protection, if needed) for the article Ranjit Singh Ahir.
The article is being repeatedly **vandalized** by anonymous or new users. Most notably, someone changed the name and details to "**Hare Krishna Singh**", which is completely incorrect and misleading. The subject of the article is *Ranjit Singh Ahir*, a known freedom fighter from Bihar who was active in the Indian Rebellion of 1857.
Such repeated disruptions are affecting the authenticity and reliability of the article. To prevent further misinformation, I kindly request that the page be protected.
Thank you for your time and support. ShyamRay011 (talk) 19:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Promotional editing has continued after protection was lifted. Insanityclown1 (talk) 19:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC) |
| 16 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I have created 35+ articles so far, I am trying to clean up the Roman-Persian wars topic currently, I noticed that there are many articles to create there. This is why I think this permission would be relevant.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 18:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
I had created around 50+ articles on the English wikipedia, I handle and edit topics mostly on colonial architectures, there are many articles needed to be created on that feild so I would like to request Autopatrolled rights for my account and also to help page reviewers for decreasing workload. Thanks! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 14:10, 10 April 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access mostly to perform reference/grammar edits. Brent Silby (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I’ll mostly use AWB for small fixes like typos and other minor errors ProtobowlAddict talk! 23:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting goes here I am an experienced theater director creating a Wikipedia article about my work that has been reviewed multiple times by AfC reviewers. I need to upload several low-resolution scans of historical press articles under fair use to support the notability of the subject. My account is more than 4 days old and has over 10 edits. Please consider granting confirmed user status so I can upload files to the English Wikipedia. Thank you! Gulu Monteiro EDP (talk) 16:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights I'd like to post images for a page I am making DoodaBooda (talk) 16:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my EC revoked because of gaming of the system. I believe this happened March 22, 2025. Since then, I have attempted to edit constructively on Wikipedia. I want to see if there is a way that I can get EC. Thanks again |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors. I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations. I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request NPR rights to contribute more effectively to this area and help reduce the backlog at NPP. I have created 18 articles and have been actively involved in patrolling new pages, tagging non-notable and promotional content for CSD and AfD. Many of the articles I have nominated for CSD or AfD have been deleted, which I believe reflects my understanding of Wikipedia's notability and content policies. With NPR rights, I will be able to continue this work more efficiently. I am familiar with relevant guidelines and policies and would appreciate the opportunity to help out in this area. Thanks for your time and consideration! Junbeesh (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
I've been an editor for a while and have experience in article creation (mainly on the shorter side for more niche areas with fewer sources) and have a few DYKs under my belt. Think my knowledge of policy demonstrated through this makes me a good fit for these permissions. Upjav (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
I wish to apply for New Page Reviewer permissions to deal with the large backlog of unreviewed pages. I have participated in many AfD discussions, which proves my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and notability guidelines. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am a quite experienced Wikipedia editor and pending changes reviewer; I may contribute in this field as well. Itemirus (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
I have significant experience patrolling new pages from years ago. I have re-familiarized myself with content policies and would like to resume. — yutsi (talk) 01:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting this permission because I want to volunteer in reducing the NPP backlog and ensuring that new pages are encyclopedic and properly cited. I believe that I am qualified to be a new page reviewer because I have created many new articles that are encyclopedic and adequately sourced, nominated new pages for speedy deletion when appropriate and have participated in the AfD process. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
I have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days, I kindly request renewal of this right to continue reviewing articles. Thank you. Mekomo (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
I am an AFC reviewer asking for another trial or permanent permission for this flag. Last time, it was granted by @Sohom Datta: for a 2-month trial after the first month trial was successful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I’d like to request NPR right for a 45 day trial. I’m familiar with key policy WP:N, WP:V, WP:NPOV, and deletion criteria, CSD, PROD, & AfD. I want to test myself with this role and help reduce the backlog by reviewing new pages carefully and in line with Wiki guidelines. Oxiyam.Primal (talk) 10:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have 1 denied applied about a month ago because I didn't have 500 undeleted Main space edits at the time. I now have 501 so I am reapplying for temporary permissions. I have a decent amount of experience going through AfDs and source searching to check if they are notability. Moritoriko (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I would like to expand my contributions to Wikipedia by helping address the extensive backlog at NPP. I have been an active participant in the AfC process as a probationary reviewer for multiple months, and I regularly take part in AfDs and occasionally in PRODs within the scope of WP:PHILIPPINES. While I understand that my impact on the backlog may not be significant in terms of numbers, I am committed to performing thorough, policy-aligned reviews to the best of my ability. AstrooKai (Talk) 19:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
I had a trial permission to manage redirects close to a year ago, if I remember correctly. I did not have time for the back half of that trial, but have more time now. I have noticed how large the article backlog is and would try to work on lowering that, since I am finding myself with a lot more free time on here. Generally think I have a good past experience with AfD, not as much as some, but understand most guidelines well. May leave some more questionable pages up for a different reviewer, but have a good record adding categories and WikiProjects on my own article. Lots of my current pages are election pages or football pages, so might lean more into reviewing those since I am most familiar with those guidelines. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 15:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I was granted temporary New page reviewer rights on 14 January 2025 ([9]) for a period of two months and again on 20 March ([10]) for an additional month. This current period is due to expire on 20 April. I would appreciate it if these rights could be extended and made permanent. Thank you. QEnigma talk 05:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have read the WP:PCCRITERIA and I believe that I meet them. I sometimes see pending edits waiting for approval on articles, and I believe that I could do this job myself. wojtekpolska1013 [talk page] 09:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been active on Wikipedia, I'd like to request PCR to monitor recent changes. I'm aware of WP:NOTVANDAL & WP:AGF, so there won't be any "biting newcomers" reverts. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting PCR to help out with reviewing pending changes I notice when patrolling recent changes. I have read and am familiar with the policies. I'd like to think I would make a good reviewer. LightlySeared (talk) 08:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
I recently began using the WP:RCPS script to rollback vandalism. However I'm currently unable to mark edits as patrolled when I determine they are benign or productive. I'm guessing I need this permission to do that? Could I be added? Cheers, Patrick (talk) 15:49, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi! My name is WormEater13. I would like to request PCR rights. Having created multiple articles before and having made over 100 manual mainspace edits, especially for WP:BLP, I believe that I am knowledgable about Wikipedia policies such as WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:NOTABILITY. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting permission to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I spend most of my day editing Wikipedia. I have gone through almost all the pages under Category:Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's policies on vandalism detection, BLP policy, NPOV, Verifiability, and copyright. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes guideline. Please consider my request. Somajyoti ✉ 07:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights on English Wikipedia to tackle with the edits protected with pending changes while patrolling in the RC, since I have rollback rights. I think I fulfill the criteria to get this right. Also, I understand the related policies to manage these edits. This would give me a better chance to work to improve Wikipedia. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I'd like to try some other counter-vandalism tools, such as AntiVandal, Huggle, and SWViewer, which require the rollback right to use. I've actively been patrolling recent changes for roughly 3-4 months and have consistently warned editors when reverting them. Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Greetings, I am requesting for the rollback rights to assist my passion in fighting against vandalism and roll off disruptive edits on Wikipedia, I actively scroll on recent changes feed and also new page feeds, I am familiar with WP:VANDALISM, I wish to use the AntiVandal tool which will help me revert more edits that goes against Wikipedia policies, I will love to help the community, Thanks to any admin willing at his or her discretion to grant me this permission. Best Regards (CP) 22:07, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing constructively on the project for a few years now and would like to more effectively revert disruptive edits when I encounter them. I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies and understand the distinction between purely disruptive edits and edits that may be unhelpful but are made in good-faith. When reverting a new user's edits, I make sure to properly explain myself in an edit summary and leave a message on the relevant article's or user's talk page as appropriate, unless the user is obviously acting in bad faith and WP:DENY applies, in which case I report them to a relevant noticeboard. I have thoroughly read the WP:ROLLBACK instructions and will make sure to familiarize myself with the tools before using them, and avoid using the rollback tools when they are not appropriate and another reversion tool would be more suitable. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback permissions to help combat vandalism more effectively on Wikipedia, I have been reverting vandalism for a good amount of time from recent changes using twinkle and undo. Therefore I think rollback tool can help me to assist in identifying and reverting unconstructive edits efficiently. Imwin567 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I would like to get a rollback. I often search for vandalism on Wikipedia, and it will obviously be easier for me to fight it with a rollback. I warn users when necessary, and i know the most important WP policies. The Seal F1 (talk) 07:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello! Im requesting rollback rights because i am an extended confirmed user that has made hundreds of high-quality edits in mainspace. I need rollback tool to revert vandalism and other non-constructive edits more easier. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 21:18, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |
Immediate requests
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 83 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 2 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 24 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
Deletion
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 611 |
| Templates for deletion | 224 |
| Categories for deletion | 126 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 32 |
| All redirects for discussion | 467 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 37 |
| Possible copyright violations | 26 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 214 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 11 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 1 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 68 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 659 |
| Unknown copyright status | 60 |
| Unknown source | 23 |
| No non-free use rationale | 4 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 15 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 8 |
Page protection
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,278 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 452 |
| Protected against vandalism | 5 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,347 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,213 | 0.49 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,267 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,348 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 40,911 | 0.59 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 11,505 | 0.16 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 544,220 | 7.8 |
| All articles lacking sources | 64,981 | 0.93 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 23 | 0 |
| All articles needing additional references | 482,299 | 6.91 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,663 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 106,114 | 1.52 |
| All articles with dead external links | 286,712 | 4.11 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 130 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 17 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles to be merged | 1,201 | 0.02 |
| All articles to be split | 806 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 2 | - |
| Stub categories | 19,744 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 506 | 0.01 |
| All orphaned articles | 54,306 | 0.78 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 2,253 | 0.03 |
| All articles with style issues | 19,379 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,770 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,586 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 1,223 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 5,136 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,840 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 3 |
| All articles to be expanded | 65,573 |
Special pages
[edit]| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]
Misc
[edit] Delete
|
 Keep
|
 Neutral
|
 Oppose
|
 Support
|
 Note
|
 Template
|
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
| Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||